Monday, June 15, 2009

College Rooney Rule: Let's clarify something

As part of my daily routine at work, I was checking out CollegeFootballNews.com's Daily Roundtable series.

Today's discussion was interesting, as the question was "Should college football have an official Rooney Rule, the NFL rule that requires teams to interview minority head coaching candidates?"

The answer I have is: Yes, to a degree.

Before engaging in further discussion on this point, remember that the general point of the rule is to simply interview minority candidates. There is no implication that the minority candidate has to be the one hired.

I think that the issue that some people have is the issue that lots of people have with affirmative action programs; they presume that increasing the candidate pool means that they have to hire that person.

But what the Rooney Rule and a true affirmative action program sets up is an interview. That is all.

There is no mandate that the minority candidate has to be hired to fulfill some sort of quota system.

The best man will, and should, get the job. It just serves as a reminder that the best man may not always look the way he has traditionally looked.

While the Auburn hire of Gene Chizik is curious (at best, IMHO), at least Turner Gill was in the candidate pool. Now, if he wasn't good enough to get the job, then that's fine. Auburn found the coach that was the best fit.

I'd be more concerned if he didn't even get the call to come down to the Plains.

Monday, December 1, 2008

A little bit more on the Big 12 South mess

Inaugurating this blog with a continuation of a rant I started on Bleacher Report.

Let's go a bit further inside the numbers to see how things would have played out if point differential were factored in.

Starting with listing the common opponents for Oklahoma, Texas and Texas Tech:
Baylor
Kansas
Oklahoma State
Texas A&M

All three schools beat these four common opponents.

Now, we get to do a little math:
Oklahoma's scores against the four opponents:
Baylor: 49-17
Kansas: 45-31
Oklahoma State: 61-41
Texas A&M: 66-28
Aggregate Score: 221-117
Point differential = 104

Texas's scores against the four opponents:
Baylor: 45-21
Kansas: 35-7
Oklahoma State: 28-24
Texas A&M: 49-9
Aggregate Score: 157-61
Point differential = 96

Texas Tech's scores against the four opponents:
Baylor: 35-28
Kansas: 63-21
Oklahoma State: 56-20
Texas A&M: 43-25
Aggregate Score: 197-94
Point differential = 103

So, by way of point differential, Oklahoma barely edges out the other two. Which, in a year when three teams of almost equal value are battling for one spot, naturally it should come down to slim margins. But at least this slim margin left things on the field.