Friday, February 26, 2010

Celebrate good times...or not

Canada loves hockey.

Okay, that actually might be a bit of an understatement.

Hockey is to Canada what football is to America.

That might be a better analogy.

Of course, American football is not in the Olympics. But hockey is.

Last night, the Canadian women's ice hockey team beat the United States, 2-0 to win the gold medal at the 2010 Olympic Games in Vancouver.

So the Canadian women won the gold medal in what serves as the national pasttime of the country.

They went up on the podium, accepted their medals and smiled and waved to the crowd.

They went into the locker room.

And then, about a half hour later, they came back out (after the crowd had left!) and took some pictures on the ice. Full slideshow here:



As Col. Kurtz said, "The horror … the horror."

Okay, not really.

The building was empty except for media and arena staff.

Yes, there was underage drinking going on, since 18 year old phenom Marie-Philip Poulin won't be considered legal in B.C. until next month.

So, yes, she was a minor drinking. Like that's never happened in a celebratory locker room before.

The IOC is determined to investigate this horrific crime against all things good and decent.

Please. Simmer down, IOC.

Would the IOC have rather this occurred in the locker room with the door closed?

Or is the IOC upset that women in a western nation acted like men in celebrating a hard earned victory over a rival (and really, their only close competitor in this sport, but that's another issue).

Let me tell you this: if this was the Canadian men acting like this, I wouldn't expect to hear a peep out of the IOC.

Here's what should happen to the Canadian women's ice hockey team:

Not a damn thing.

Because if the IOC decides that they need to punish these athletes for a celebration, well, I'll let the duck explain:

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Someone in the NBA offices in New York must have been bored

With a lockout impending, it's good to see that the NBA front office is addressing the issues that are critical to on-court performance.

No, they're not looking at hiring better officials.

Apparently, they are too focused on Caron Butler's straw chewing habit.

The NBA has ordered Butler, now with the Dallas Mavericks, to stop chewing on straws during games.

I wish this was a joke. Or an Onion headline.

Sadly, it appears to be the real deal.


I am just baffled as to why this is a big deal.

It's not like he has a bong out (as former Maverick Josh Howard might have done if allowed).

Butler says that chewing the straws helps calm him down. I also remember a profile of him a couple of years ago that made reference to the fact that they had to be McDonald's straws—and that he could tell the difference between McDonald's and other fast food straws with his eyes closed.

It's a bit of a bad habit, to be sure, but to tell him he can't do it seems petty and unnecessary.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Big Ten Expansion Round 3: C.R.E.A.M.

(For previous installments on Big Ten Expansion, visit here and here).

One thing that I found interesting about the Pac-10 analysis was how few of the athletic departments ran overall surpluses. Football made money and was in the black, but the departments were balanced.

In the Big Ten? Not so much.

Big Ten Financial Analysis

I would say that Texas and Notre Dame come out favorably in this examination based on overall revenue and how well their football programs have performed financially (and in Texas's case, on the field as well.)

Of course, I probably should mention that it appears that Texas will not be joining the party, if Wisconsin athletic director Barry Alvarez is to be believed.

I believe that this is a fluid situation, so we will have to stay tuned.

Pac-10 Expansion Round 3: C.R.E.A.M.

(For previous installments on Pac-10 Expansion, visit here and here.)

Round three of Pac-10 expansion talk has us looking at some financial information about the current membership of the conference and the contenders.

The information looked at in this exercise is taken from reports that the colleges and universities across this land submitted to the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Postsecondary Education. The site "Equity in Athletics Data Analysis" has all of the nasty bits about how much schools spend on athletics.

Time to make some more sausage.

The factors we are examining today for the schools are:
1) Number of players on the football team
2) Operating expenses per player
3)  Expenses by the football program
4) Revenue brought in by the football program
5) Profit/loss by the football program
6) Athletic department revenue
7) Athletic department expenses
8) Profit/loss by the athletic department

The numbers are from the last fiscal year for higher education (July 1, 2008-June 30, 2009). Before we go any further, let me post the cautionary note from the OPE:


"Please note that valid comparisons of athletics data are possible only with study and analysis of the conditions affecting each institution"

Everyone got that? Okay?

Great. Here we go:

Pac-10 Financial Analysis 

Once again, it appears that the best fit for the Pac-10 if it were to expand would include some combination of Colorado, BYU and Utah. While their spending habits (especially for BYU and Utah) are more in line fiscally with Washington State than with, say, USC, they are definitely ahead of Fresno State or Boise State with regards to the funds available and funds expended.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Big Ten Expansion Round 2: Television Market Share

In the first round of Pac-10 expansion talks, I posted the reputational academic bonafides of the current Big Ten Schools and their potential new brethern.

In this round, we will look at the television markets that are currently being utilized and what a newcomer would have to offer.

Now, when talking markets, we are going to refer to the specific regional markets for these teams. The market sizes are done based off of data from Nielsen Media Research.

As with the Pac-10 television markets exercise,  note that some markets may contain more than one city. With the Big Ten, the largest market may not necessarily be the city where the school is actually located (see Penn State):

Illinois (Champaign-Urbana/Springfield/Decatur): 84
Indiana (Indianapolis): 25
Iowa (Cedar Rapids): 88
Michigan (Detroit): 11
Michigan State (Lansing/Jackson): 115
Minnesota (Minneapolis/St. Paul): 15
Northwestern (Chicago): 3
Ohio State (Columbus): 34
Penn State (Altoona/Johnstown): 101
Purdue (Lafayette): 191
Wisconsin (Madison): 85

Not a lot of large markets. At least, not as many as the Pac-10. But that's also because of the nature of where the campuses are located and how the conferences evolved.

So let's look at the schools that the Big Ten has an eye on (allegedly):

Missouri (Columbia/Jefferson City): 137

Notre Dame (South Bend/Elkhart): 91
Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh): 23
Rutgers (New York City): 1
Syracuse (Syracuse): 83
Texas (Austin): 48

Now it looks interesting, doesn't it?

If the Big Ten wants to pull in a new market, why not try and tap into the largest market that is still out there in New York City?

Michigan and Penn State have huge alumni bases in the city already, and New York is the unconquered final frontier as far as college football goes.

And if the NFL locks out its players for the 2011 season (and if Rutgers can find the magic of the 2006 season again....)

Pac-10 Expansion Round 2: Television Market Share

In the first round of Pac-10 expansion talks, I posted the reputational academic bonafides of the current Pac-10 Schools and their potential new brethern.

In this round, we will look at the television markets that are currently being utilized and what a newcomer would have to offer.

Now, when talking markets, we are going to refer to the specific regional markets for these teams. The market sizes are done based off of data from Nielsen Media Research.

So, while Oregon games might be shown in Portland, the designated market for Oregon is Eugene.

It's important to note that the Pac-10 has six schools in the top fifteen markets, including two teams in the number two market of Los Angeles, CA. So, obviously, the Pac-10 would probably want to bring in a market with a pretty significant reach.

Also note that some markets encompass more than one city.

First, the Pac-10 schools. Home market in parentheses:
Arizona (Tucson): 66
Arizona State (Phoenix): 12
California (San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose): 6
Oregon (Eugene): 119
Oregon State (Eugene): 119
Stanford (San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose): 6
UCLA (Los Angeles): 2
USC (Los Angeles): 2
Washington (Seattle/Tacoma): 13
Washington State (Spokane): 75

And the potential contenders that I have identified for ascencion to the Pac-10:
Boise State (Boise): 112
Brigham Young (Salt Lake City): 31
Colorado (Denver): 16
Fresno State (Fresno/Visalia): 55
Utah (Salt Lake City): 31

As in round one, it looks like Colorado, Utah and BYU are the front runners after round two, as the Denver and Salt Lake City markets outpace Fresno and Boise.

Sports Aren't Perfect, but They Do Offer Escape

Hat tip to Andrew Sullivan for providing the link to this Newsweek screed by Christopher Hitchens.
In his rant, Hitchens derides international sports for (apparently) breeding conflict and contempt around the world. Hitchens also rails against how sports dumbs down contemporary society and political discourse:

Our own political discourse, already emaciated enough, has been further degraded by the continuous importation of sports "metaphors": lame and vapid and cheery expressions like "bottom of the ninth," "goal line," and who knows what other tripe. Hard enough on the eyes and ears as this is—and there are some cartoonists who can't seem to draw without it—it also increases the deplorable tendency to look at the party system as a matter of team loyalty, which is the most trivial and parochial form that attachment can take.

Oh, and don't forget about how it affects newspapers (which we all know are a thriving institution):
I can't count the number of times that I have picked up the newspaper at a time of crisis and found whole swaths of the front page given over either to the already known result of some other dull game or to the moral or criminal depredations of some overpaid steroid swallower. Listen: the paper has a whole separate section devoted to people who want to degrade the act of reading by staring enthusiastically at the outcomes of sporting events that occurred the previous day. These avid consumers also have tons of dedicated channels and publications that are lovingly contoured to their special needs. All I ask is that they keep out of the grown-up parts of the paper.

Well. It's good to know that I am considered a boob and an imbecile because I enjoy watching sports.

Heaven forbid I do nothing but wring my hands about the events of the day.

Look, when I turn on the local news and hear about random murders taking place in my fair city, and that I could lose my job because the school I work for could be closed to try and help stave off a $1 billion deficit in the state, and that the mayor of the city is irrationally insulted because the president slighted our fair city by telling people to not blow their life savings here, guess what?

I want to watch a basketball game to take my mind off of things.

But the notion that sports fosters international conflicts? The absolutely ludicrous notion that it's sports metaphors that have fostered the dumbing down of political discourse in this country?

You, sir, have got to be kidding me.

Do some folks around the world care too much about sports? Absolutely. Look at the man who was killed after the 1994 World Cup for scoring an "own goal" (accidentally scoring a goal against his own team).

Look that the treatment of Steve Bartman, a Chicago Cubs fan who was basically sent to exile because of a mistake he made during the 2003 playoffs.

Look at the countless cases of hooliganism that have taken place in the U.K. because of soccer matches.

Look at the students at Mississippi State University and West Virginia University the last couple of weeks, as these college students have thrown things onto the court during the games.

I will not deny that these acts occur.

But look at the tale told by the recent Oscar nominated movie Invictus.

Look at what the run to the 2001 World Series by my baseball team, the New York Yankees, did to help my hometown forget about the terrible tragedy that occurred.

Heck, I would encourage Hitchens to look no further than New Orleans for an example of how sports can heal a community that has suffered a horrible tragedy.

In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina stuck the Big Easy. The first professional franchise in the city, the New Orleans Saints, had to leave town and became a vagabond franchise. There was talk of the team permanently relocating to San Antonio because there was no way to know if New Orleans was ever going to be rebuilt.
But the NFL was committed to the Saints returning to New Orleans (and the NBA did the same with the Hornets).

The Saints returned to the Superdome on September 25, 2006. Less than 90 seconds into the game, this happened:


The game was essentially over at that point.

Four years later, the Saints won the Super Bowl.

Now, the citizens of New Orleans realize that things are not better just because the Saints are winners. Parts of the city still have not been rebuilt and may never be rebuilt.

But the Saints offer them a chance to spend some time not worrying about how things are. It's an escape, and the win also triggers some civic pride.

That's the power of what sports can do.

The games do sometimes need to be placed in their proper context, Mr. Hitchens, but don't dismiss sports as a simple opiate of the masses.

In order to keep life in balance, we need the not so serious stuff.